Radix Major: A first impression is that the Radix Aspect Configuration is rather vague, or diffuse, though there is angularity and strong focus on conjunctions. The Sun is strongly In Config, the Moon more vaguely (though in angular proximity to Jupiter). It will be important here early on to look at Harmonics – and the Dispositor Tree.
The Moon (People) at the Ascendant clearly signifies China’s official name.
Radix Minor: Close, applicative Quincunx: Moon-150-Uranus
A precise time for this birth chart is not universally agreed upon – though a commonly accepted ground is the new Constitution & affixing of seal:
Paris: 1958-Oct-05 00:00 CET – New Constitution comes into effect
Paris: 1958-Oct-06 18:30 CET – Affixing of seal
--- To me, it seems that 18:30 fits well
--- (Some use the 1792-chart)
-W- http://www.orion-astro.com/fr/elections.php –[Indian/Sidereal]
Jean-François Faccin uses 18:20 MET/CET, and Beatrice Boucher uses 18:21 MET/CET (the latter gives references).
-W- http://www.oxfordastrologer.com/2012/03/liberte-egalite-identite.html#comment-13604 — Cf. Comment: Jean Funken 12:49 pm
-W-(http://www.oxfordastrologer.com/2015/01/charlie-hebdo.html#comment-36594 — Cf. Comment: Pat 8:36 pm
We have an exact time range between 18:20 and 18:35. The data are clear and solid, and we have an applicable mundane chart. This is an ideal situation for a test. Other branches of astrology must be evaluated by their own principles. My goal here is solely to demonstrate the inherent simplicity of the Static-Dynamical model.
There will be many Dynamical Angular Primary Directions to consider here, in France’s Radix. I will start with the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris on January 7, 2015. By progressing the 18:30 Radix chart, we see (r.IC.d)-conj-(r.Pluto) In Config. We know that (r.IC.d) will ‘hit home’, and here we also have (r.IC.d)-square-(r.Mars).
We must check other factors before we can rectify the chart with certainty, but the timing and interpretational relevance is close enough. There will always be a variant orbis, regardless of which directional ‘key’ one applies – and, importantly, all astrological prognostical/retrospective analysis refers to a period, a time interval, which again may be more closely pinpointed by secondary progressions, not the least P.Moon, slow transits – and even swift significatory transits. Some astrologers may use still more variables, of which some are purely symbolic. My method is adhering to Nature as she presents herself to our senses. A long-duration direction needs a ‘trigger’, and that is what we’re looking for in all such cases.
There will be other German charts to consider, but let us start here. Angularity. First impression: A rather uncommon, bisected main configuration. Minor: Close, separative Quincunx: [Mars]-150-[Neptune (in Stellium)]. Radix Moon: In Config.
|-| Myanmar=Burma | Yangon=Rangoon |-|
As you may have guessed, I’m going to get into the Turkish Circus.
Do we now have new arguments for inviting more influence therefrom?
# [Sheet]: TURKEY
Draft, Pending images
# Radix: December 1, 1991
# In Config
Astrologically, the Ukrainian situation (crisis) in the last few years has been very clear in the December 1 Chart. But can I through astrology alone say for sure which precise countries are most active in the game?
T.Uranus conj r.MC
T.Pluto conj r.(Uranus conj Neptune) --[in T-square with r.MC & r.Moon]
A Meme ‘City State’
Minor: Close, separative Quincunx: Saturn-150-Jupiter
You’ll get dizzy if you start reading about the history, names, and ramifications of this phenomenon. I intentionally call it that, as this rather undefined group is a creation of the West, or say the closest allies of us here in the West. It is of our own making. If you ever should doubt it, you can do a lot of study and invest a large amount of time and energy – or you can just use your own eyes.
Do you remember the large highway exodus in Kuwait – where convoys and a large number of other cars were bombed and burned to smithers? Have you compared that to the hundreds of brand-new Toyotas that in the last few years have rolled in long rows out in the open, for an extended duration, in broad daylight – with these scary Islamic fighters waving flags and weapons? [Search ‘Islamic State Toyotas’]
Let that be for your own consideration. My errand here, as an astrologer, is to ask whether we have a chart for the ‘Caliphate Declaration’ – and yes, it may well be that we have. I can think of no better source than Geoffrey Cornelius, and we have it from he himself. For now, I give this link at The Oxford Astrologer, and we will see if I later go more into it.
In the passing, let me remind you that although we have much to gather from the archives at Astrodienst and their Astro-Databank, we have more than one example of their sloppiness at times, so you should not take all data there at face value! As always, a researcher is someone who does research independently. Look here. They even cite Cornelius. Shouldn’t they have had enough time by now to at least make a note?
Pyramids in Antarctica?
The answer is probably both yes and no. There are almost certainly ancient remains and traces in Antarctica, but the way mountain peaks often are ‘found’ as pyramids, is more dubious. The whole complex must be seen in relation to what is said elsewhere in this Cauldron about that enormous area – and history.
We also know as an indisputable fact that much is kept under wraps. Does anyone that has done some investigation trust the Egyptian authorities in charge of their monuments? Do you hear much about the many pyramids all over the world?
The Flat Earth Farce
This page has some value as to recent history. However, the whole FE scenario/community is now defunct and ridden with conflicts. The following text originally had some merit, but it is now being edited and rewritten in the past tense. Regard this page as a transient layout!
2018: Antarctic circumnavigation
The Bastion: Dilemma or Solution?
Antarctica is being Unveiled
FE concepts are disproved by ground Facts
People are reacting. The stale arrogance from some quarters can be appalling. The public has every right to demand answers. Pure scientism and orthodoxy is well known through history, and financial dependency is a core element.
We are witnessing a fast-growing number of people who no longer trust established institutions. Many are well aware of the vast amounts of funding involved.
One such focus is that we have not yet seen indisputable, observable evidence as to every claim and how regarding Earth, Moon, and orbiting satellites – live footage of our vicinity in situ as seen from Space at a distance. With the present technology, ~50 years after 1969, feeble excuses for the lack of real, convincing photographic documentation are not acceptable or credible. The public does not know with certainty the mechanics of what is there.
That the ‘Net contains a very large number of posts regarding what can loosely be referred to as ‘Flat Earth’, testifies to that fact.
Here, I focus on one direct, logical approach, avoiding complications as to ‘real’ images from agencies like NASA – as well as to irrelevant beliefs.
Initially, the Questions about Space, curvature, or potential machinations are in effect redundant. Every FE tenet can definitively be disproved when we can demonstrate that it is possible to cross the whole width of Antarctica by land, from a shoreline to the coast on the opposite side of the continent – by what most people will perceive as a straight North-South-North, or longitudinal, path from one ocean to the next.
We should be able to approach the South Pole by land, or by air near the ground, from diametrically opposed coasts of Antarctica. Can we not succinctly show that it is feasible? Has it ever been done? As described below – yes.
The geographical concepts will be different for a Flat-Earther, but the principles and arguments are clear and coherent. Valid, fundamental points are being raised. They remain unanswered and unresolved. Therein lies the crux.
We don’t need the ramifications of speculation, religion or other belief systems. We need terrestrial, impeccable proof – an irrefutable, conclusive response to a single, simple challenge.
Diametrical Land Crossing of Antarctica
Basic FE concepts have long since been definitively invalidated by terrestrial variables alone.
My fascination with the whole FE scenario stemmed primarily from its relevance to my own craft. In this context now, I will leave to others the specific questions pertinent to space agencies or possible divergent machinations.
The whole social ‘Net space as such is often somewhat infantile – plus fragmentation and diversion from real issues. Intentional, paid trolling. Injection of false models. As to FE, there still are fascinating arguments which would have had impact in a better (political) context. The reason that I’ve written much about it is that Norway has a stake and a long history in Antarctica.
A couple of links just to indicate my current focus:
The Longest March
Rune Gjeldnes, 2006
The area on the peninsula side is well covered. Therefore this path can be seen as diametrical.
Challenging your Flat Earth Fallacies!
(And your Handlers)
Real Astrologers are in a good position to counter FE claims. Most of us are independent from rigid structures, and our role is to observe. We see actors on stages. Astrology is at a vantage point.
FEIC did it for me. The subject is hijacked. The question now is which forces are behind, and what are the intentions?
More Land! Cross the ice plains and find hidden land! says another charlatan in his playground. It is already shown, without intricacy, that The Ice Ring is not a Reality.
Antarctica is key to every FE delusion. Antarctica is a bastion to be unveiled. There are many reasons to take a parallel look at Antarctica. The scope and importance is defined earlier in Soria Moria.
Some may not yet fully know the surreal proportions and how all-encompassing the ruse is. I’m going to unravel it. Logic and ordinary, accessible means shall be the only prerequisites.
The Antarctic Midnight Sun is first in line. We will see if it can be documented by everyone without any need for equipment.
Le retour du jour polaire
Le soleil ne se couchera plus en Terre-Adélie pour l’année 2017.
Genuine or Spurious Land Crossings of Antarctica?
(Of the whole Continent)
Has a longitudinal land crossing of the whole of Antarctica, or approaching the South Pole from opposite sides of the continent, ever happened? Yes, as shown above, a diametrical land crossing was completed in 2006.
These are examples of what we normally are presented with:
Clicking the above images takes you directly to two sources of information. Both serve here as a starting point.
My main errand is finding out if and when there ever has been, or will soon be, genuine longitudinal land crossings of the whole width of Antarctica, as described in this page. I will delve further into the whole meta scenario, with constituents. This outline will be enlarged upon, with far more coordinated documentation.
Antarctica Weather Manipulation
Truthstream Media: www.youtube.com/watch?v=olJv2syNw9A
Antarctica Is the Key to Controlling the Weather
What is Antarctica about?
Truthstream Media: www.youtube.com/watch?v=237F1_aLXZ8
The Real Secrets Hidden in Antarctica…
Will Flat Earthers listen to this?
Ken Ham: www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSVysKcfzmA
Astronaut Barry E. Wilmore
The Flat Earth Farce Resolved?
Southern Lights – Aurora Australis
Does this tally with Flat Earth?
Flight to the lights, Cockpit view (Raw footage)
Ian Griffin: www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tkIuWqe2lU
Flight to the Lights – Public Group: www.facebook.com/groups/auroraaustralisflight/
Ian Griffin: www.facebook.com/groups/auroraaustralisflight/permalink/403953463296802/
Do you see any Real footage here?
European Space Agency, ESA: www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT7typHkpVg
Space debris – a journey to Earth
In situ? Actual?
Conclusion: Flat Earth is Impotent!
After over a couple of years having closely watched this theater unfold, and lately having tested waters some more, my stance is that political stout overall is evidently lacking. Here is described a viable route to take if we wanted to cringe the NSA somewhat. It is the same regarding NASA. There is one solution to the whole charade, and that is the route not definitively chosen by the ‘flat earthers’ as a group: We want that Real footage of the hovering Earth! It should obviously be easy enough to obtain within a short time span, and it would have enormous advantages for all parties, in every thinkable way. That would give us a conclusive answer. So why don’t we demand it? Is it not public money? Ours?
It ought not to be unknown that Money is an illusion – what Rulers do is stealing our property and from that creating Real wealth and gluttony for themselves. Who are financing these space activities? Who’s ‘money’ is it?
Isn’t it safe to say now, that the momentum we see growing consists of millions of people – more or less informed, but active in some way? I appreciate the work all overall do – it is amazing and impressive.
There is not a lot more I could say here at this point. Hopefully, someone will take the baton, so conveyed to communities, all can move on. I want to move on.
The described first-hand experience of direct Censorship from people close to NASA is surprising. There are no objective reasons. A nerve is hit. The arrogance is explicit. Such are their manners. It is political and oppressive. I have said nothing that is not straightforward and factual. Scrutiny of intricacies and deception is definitely important, and no-one else but ourselves are going to effect it.
In future days my main focus will rather be examining ‘evidence’ from ‘globers’ – I think that is the best way for scientifically minded me – and the express lane. The ball and burden of proof are clearly on them – they have the levers. Look here. Evidence?
Instead of digging into positions and bury oneself in endless speculation and self-serving tangents – what if these flat millions stood up together and potently wanted the true answer – the only short-term solution there is to this suspense? The main point: Real footage of the whole, spinning Earth seen from space at a distance. Proof of veracity. We may have seen planets all the way out to Pluto – but not our Earth. Why?
That would be what determined political action is – in the same way that we in unison could hinder water flowing to satisfy the Octopus.
Are we millions? No?
A certain tendency among ‘clickers’ is coined ‘Click & Run’. That is when they come to blogs and fast-read a page or two – and leave. They do not follow links therein, they do not read the context.
Here is an example of the level of Intelligence I have met as a reply to a YT comment I made, also containing reference to decent people:
xxxxx xxxxx 20 hours ago (names & identifier x-ed out)
“haha, just went on your ‘blog’ — there is nothing I would even remotely describe as “content”. Jan, I understand how so many people are waking up and yearning for the truth. It’s a free world and I am open to hearing every unique idea. Believing and knowing are different things remember. Nonetheless, Flat Earth cannot be substantiated as well as xxxxx in terms of alternative world views. Unfortunately there are hucksters like xx in Flat Earth who have no idea what they are talking about. It just bugs me that these douchebags use their passive aggressive political correctness B.S. to trap little old ladies. As I would say to xx or any of these people — truth much? Peace”
It is fair to say that at least half of YT comment threads are infantile, or just intentional trolling. As it has always been, the Rulers strive to divide the ‘populace’ into small, disconnected groups, quarreling among themselves about minutiae – or personal chemistries. We all know that. The whole Internet is hijacked in such a way. Some of us are old enough to remember how it started – before vital information was hidden in enormous amounts of indifference – or everything else. If you can find it at all.
We also see that some strong proponents in the actual Flat Earth movement (sic) sometimes act silly. Does that further the goal, if there is any?
Many know that this Flat Earth Society has little or no relevance to the topics discussed here – or has it? Try searching the Web for ‘Flat Earth’ and see what comes up most prominently.
Meanwhile, let us ponder about the commentator who said that obtaining Real footage of our Earth would be so expensive that it would not be accepted among taxpayers. The quick answer is that we already know that trillions are missing – vanished into hidden accounts.
Antarctica: We ourselves can solve the riddle!
The time is ripe. Much of our understanding of Reality now depends on the unanswered Questions that lately have been raised about Antarctica. What do we actually know about it? Have we actually seen the magnificent sceneries that we know exist there? Or don’t know. It is a vast expanse.
During the last couple of years, the necessity of a close scrutiny has become abundantly evident. Those who are aware know that the discussions now exist on several levels, with several layers and far-reaching ramifications.
I have put forth some thoughts and statements under Earth – and it is fundamentally immaterial and irrelevant which box some people may want to designate. This situation is tangible and not convoluted. It is quite simple:
One thing alone can answer all pending questions: Let us have Real live footage of the whole, spinning Earth seen from space at a distance – we do not any longer buy into composites, frames, or CGI pictures. There is no doubt that our technology & funding after 50 years since 1969 is well able, or is it?
By the same token we would see – in situ – photos & videos of the swarms of orbiting satellites and debris. No-one that I know of has ever seen such factual documentation.
There is more to this, but let it suffice for now. We could start discussion threads with resolve. We are the ones who should persistently ask until we have the answers – in toto! (And don’t even bother with Google Maps – they clearly do not intend to show us what Antarctica is about).
What has made me embark on this route is threefold: Following and studying what is happening – reading and watching. Seeing what has befallen Berserk and Norwegian Jarle Andhøy. Knowing that my country Norway has a stake in Antarctica.
What has made me confident and in a frank manner attach effort to this, is the observation that others with no tinfoil have done the same. I am a bit surprised by which solid, agile websites are already asking in a related, similar way. Simply asking.
The implied perspectives will initially include Questions about:
Geopolitics & Resources
Integrity of Media
Genuine response will give us conclusive and satisfying evidence and rest in a discourse that is actively up in many Quarters – with a large number of people involved. It is inferred that too many indices point against official narratives. Mainstream storylines and fragmented diversions seldom match what we can deduct ourselves.
We only need one or two convincing and unambiguous proofs of veracity. It’s our money, anyway.
Antarctic Stations, Agencies and Operations
Let’s go and understand what Antarctica is all about
Interesting place, obviously.
Programs and Intentions
A Critical Analysis
Antarctic Treaties, MPA, Mapping, and purposes today
Do we have topographic maps of the whole of Antarctica?
The whole width
A close look at Governmental Agencies and Flat Earth tenets
Norway is an integral part of this scenario. Investigating the unanswered and unresolved Questions about Antarctica will be a project to be pursued here.
Prominent visits to Antarctica
Polar satellites orbiting Earth
Let’s find them
Satellites orbiting the Moon
Can we see them?
Do you know someone who has?
The first page:
It is almost 50 years since 1969. Billions of US dollars have flown into diverse space agencies, and still do, yearly. We have not yet seen real time live footage of the whole, spinning Earth seen from space at a distance. We should have seen in situ photos & videos of swarms of orbiting satellites and debris. Where is factual documentation?
The present discussion and questions about Earth’s true shape, if it is at all possible to know, and the characteristics of what we call the Universe, has now reached such momentum that it is impossible for an astrologer to ignore it. The 7 traditional ‘planets’ can under all circumstances be understood under different lights, but in this context, the outer ones can not.
I mention this only briefly here, because, though I consider myself informed, and see it, I have not had the time to reach a conclusion. In that vein, I must warn any new to this topic, that you must be prepared to spend many months, every day, if you venture into a study of the matter. Just ask those who already have done so.
Again, this unresolved Question is inescapable, and of course even more so for astrologers. I will therefore come here again and write more; this note is only to refer to it and say that I am aware of it.
Antarctica: A thing that nags me a bit, following the discourse, is that it seldom is said much unequivocally about the huge area beyond the South Pole as seen from Argentina, basically the land that still is unclaimed, and I guess the area referred to by Admiral Byrd. No ‘ski crosser’ has been there, not even close. It is also not much publicized that there are lesser known videos of large areas with breathtaking landscapes. It is surely not all snow and ice.
Update June 17, 2016: A parallel discussion is referred to at The Daily Bell. They have lately published several new articles with relevance to the above, and with reference to Antarctica, alleged space activities, and geopolitics – including questions about the large amounts of money involved.
The momentum is growing. It is safe to say that millions of people are now with fortitude watching this unfold, and sane people are continuously contributing with new material, as well as revisiting what still craves attention.
It is now unavoidable to realize that any of the large space agencies in several countries, with their alleged resources, can alleviate this suspense in less than a week. But they don’t. Why?
One trait is the cosmological, but our general trust in, and estimation of, the whole political-societal pretense & associated ‘media’ is waning rapidly. Don’t they care?
They obviously are adamant and do not the least take us into the consideration – the populations with cherished cultures and beliefs. (I am not talking about local policies here). The interests lie completely elsewhere, with crude hidden structures. Also, it seems that there is collusion between space agencies – more than competition. Like the rest of corporatism.
Astrology: This has strong, and potentially impending, relevance to astrology. It is peculiar how (most) astrologers are oblivious here, impervious and devoid of alertness. Do they think that they can still sit in closed chambers nurturing old vocational paradigms? If the Reality is not as we are taught, the typical astrologer of today will quickly extraneously be rendered extinct.
Can astrology have any meaningful impact in the outer world if lacking consequential ethics and keen understanding of political particulars? (Diluted popularized versions can be ignored.)
We live here, this is where we came. Now it is up to us to make it happen. It is imperative.
In a post at Friends of NASA, I made this comment, which I think sums it up:
Millions of people are now watching NASA’s activities with scrutiny, in ways that the agency may not be fully prepared for. The momentum is growing. There are unanswered and unresolved Questions. They are purely logical, inescapable, and not convoluted. They are tangible. There is no room today for pretense and prolonged diversions. We want Real Live Footage of the whole, spinning Earth seen from space at a distance. It’s that simple. With the alleged resources NASA could conclusively alleviate the suspense in less than a week. But they obviously do not intend to.
I was immediately deleted and banned the very same day.
Think for yourself.
There are admittedly startling, say stunning, images to be seen there – which are not so readily displayed in more critical circles, or among those with stale beliefs. We must be wide in our approach. Composites and CGI included.
With definite, defiant political and scientific dimensions, the decisive argument stands: We want to see orbiting satellites. We want to see the whole Earth hovering and spinning in Space – in real time.
NASA’s Friends – No Free Speech
Censored! – A nice red button!
Here is what happens if you dare, in the right place, to ask questions about NASA – in a critical tone, yes, but inoffensive and factual:
Logged in – Now also unable to find the site through the search field in Google+
Above is the exact wording of the comment I posted, which was promptly censored and removed the same day – I was blocked and excluded (who knows what else). Access denied. This was an ordinary Google+ post – one among many others when scrolling down. You might think it would drown in the crowd, but even then one single comment seems to be more than these people can fathom or bear. Their idiocy is lured out. I can still find them.
The exact post cannot be shown because of the other profiles there, but here is a copy where I have x-ed out names. Mine was the 12th comment – you can compare it with the allowed communication skills among NASA’s Friends’ and their ‘likes’ (bold):
Xxx Xxxxxxx’s profile photo +3 2d
I see it very cool!
Xxx xxxx’s profile photo +2 2d
Xx Xxxxx’s profile photo 2d
I can see my house from here!
Xxxxxx Xxxxx’s profile photo +2 2d
Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxx’s profile photo +3 1d
Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxx
So so beautiful my Friend of NASA thanks goodbye!
Day ★ 25 / 06 / 2016★
Xxxxx Xxxxx’s profile photo +3 1d
This is truly awe-inspiring
Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx’s profile photo +3 1d
Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx’s profile photo +4 1d
Xxxx Xxxx’s profile photo +3 1d
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx’s profile photo +2 1d
Xxx Xxxxxxxx’s profile photo +4 1d
Has Jim Stone shot himself in the foot?
My interest in FE arguments stems from their relevance to my own craft, and I find them intriguing. Jim Stone, on the other hand, is very vocal against them. It is intentional that I don’t provide his newest site’s (searchable) link here – some of you will know why, others be warned.
My errand here is the screenshot below from some days ago, taken today. It is part of a context. I may have missed something, but now I wonder how that tallies with the FE core arguments regarding Westward vs. Eastward flights – airplanes, that is. And, I wonder where are the real in situ photos of all that orbiting junk.
If nothing else, this may be an opportunity to question his claims, overall.
My answer to one who asked why I even care about FE:
Some of the points:
– Wide political implications
– There are unanswered Questions
– Vast amounts of public money implied, also black budgets
– Antarctica is the crux, in diverse ways
– A large number of people involved
Therefore, it cannot be ignored. I am a real Astrologer, and the topic is relevant. We do not fully understand the Reality we live in, and there are constructs and explanatory models by all parties.
What I have yet to see, is genuine response and coherent arguments as to the basic, valid questions raised by the FE’s. Other than that, I have long since left the divisive FE community as such behind me.
Quotes/Map: “Trans-Antarctic”, “across”, “opposite coast”
2018: O’Brady’s and Rudd’s non-diametrical crossings can be added to the list.